[173091] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Net Neutrality...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brett Glass)
Tue Jul 15 19:57:26 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:57:08 -0600
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Brett Glass <nanog@brettglass.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGFn2k1WAcWt=RqJ9Xp5oOzhafvotwaPfx0YQLoLdxNBMk5XZw@mail.g
mail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
At 05:06 PM 7/15/2014, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>Do you see Connect America Fund, the successor to Universal Service Fund,
>as a threat to US rural WISPs or as the possible solution for them ?
It's a major threat to rural WISPs and all competitive ISPs. Here's
why. The FCC is demanding that ISPs become "Eligible
Telecommunications Carriers," or ETCs, before they can receive
money from it. An ETC is a telephone company which is regulated
under the mountain of regulations, requirements, and red tape of
Title II of the Telecomm Act. It has to report to both state
regulatory agencies AND the FCC. It's a classification that doesn't
fit ISPs at all, but they would have to subject themselves to this
heavy-handed regulation before they could get a dime from the fund.
The FCC just announced a "rural broadband experiment" in which it
will fund ETCs, but not pure-play ISPs, to build out rural broadband; see
http://www.fcc.gov/document/rural-broadband-experiments-order
As part of this experiment, the FCC will pay telephone companies to
overbuild us, even though the residents of the areas in question
already have service. This is because, as far as the regulators are
concerned, if they do not have their regulatory hooks in us, we
don't exist and any service we provide does not count. The
"experiment" also requires participants to tie up large amounts of
money in escrow accounts so that they can obtain "letters of
credit" guaranteeing performance.
All of this is, alas, the regulators' way of attempting to destroy
those whom they cannot regulate.
IMHO, the USF is outmoded and should be disbanded.
--Brett Glass
