[172986] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: paleolithic inquiry
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Mon Jul 14 12:14:47 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <F4C8886E-A76C-4216-9541-C0ADEDDDE3EC@toaster.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:15:14 -0400
To: Sean Lazar <knife@toaster.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Jul 12, 2014, at 12:45 AM, Sean Lazar <knife@toaster.net> wrote:
> I think we should paint the garden shed blue...
I will say I'm starting to see a larger number of devices in the =
marketplace and locations where cellular data are making sense to =
replace POTS as OOB. The problem I always have is, if you are going to =
use it as OOB, where does it connect back to. Many of them want to VPN =
into a few points, but without knowing the ongoing state of their ip =
connectivity, one doesn't want to end up as the upstream for your oob :)
You also need considerations akin to rfc2182 as well.
- Jared=
