[172934] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barry Shein)
Sun Jul 13 15:35:08 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 15:34:33 -0400
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m238e62d4j.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


On July 13, 2014 at 11:42 randy@psg.com (Randy Bush) wrote:
 > 
 > ahhh.   so 
 > 
 >    not government regulated == wild west
 > 
 > got it

Let's not forget that the big players in all this have
cross-subsidized from huge, government-protected monopolies or
very-small-N oligopolies in cable, phone services and wire plants,
etc.

To now suggest that non-governmental business processes would be
superior to arbitrate interconnects etc seems, to me, highly
disingenuous as a principled position.

Let Comcast, TW, AT&T, Verizon, etc relinquish their monopoly
protections and then perhaps we can see something resembling a free
and open business climate evolve. Even that would deny that they
already have become vast and powerful on these govt-mandated
sinecures.

I'd argue it's not the wild west inasmuch as it's more like the old
joke about three wolves and a sheep voting on dinner. But the imagery
of range wars is apt.


-- 
        -Barry Shein

The World              | bzs@TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post