[172896] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miles Fidelman)
Sat Jul 12 18:25:12 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 18:19:56 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
CC: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140712211557.5849234.83970.28378@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Personally, I'm not being sarcastic at all.
Right now, peering agreements are the wild west. But.. there's
rulemaking going on at the FCC - driven by all the talk about "network
neutrality" and "Internet Fast Lanes" -- that is likely to have real
impacts on all of us. Most of what passes for "discussion" is posturing
by various big players, interest groups, and pundits. (To an earlier
comment - Verizon is not a small ISP; but neither is Netflix a small
business.)
These are real questions, that merit serious examination - not to
mention serious input to the current FCC rulemaking from knowledgeable
folks.
Just one man's opinion, of course.
Miles Fidelman
deleskie@gmail.com wrote:
> I've only been 1/2 paying attention, did I miss the <sarcasm> tag are are people really looking for those answers.
>
> -jim
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
> Original Message
> From: Miles Fidelman
> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 6:11 PM
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
>
> Joly MacFie wrote:
>> Now we're
>>> so far off in the weeds, I can't even
>>> see where we started from. ^_^;;
>>>
>>
>> What I'd like to know is
>>
>> 1) when does a terminating network become a transit network, and..
>> 2 )are there, should there, be different peering standards for each, and
>> 3) if so some kind of functional if not structural separation
>> 4) by regulation?
>>
>>
> Ditto. These questions really get to the nub of the current issues!
>
> Miles Fidelman
>
>
>
>
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
