[172866] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miles Fidelman)
Fri Jul 11 17:49:39 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:49:18 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
CC: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGU0ftB8p+UwPrKJ5Hvu2H769oaVam4yNqjVNJJuJAgLVA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Miles Fidelman
> <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
>> Then again, I've often argued that the "universal service fund" used to
>> subsidize rural carriers - which the large telcos always scream about - is
>> legitimate, because when we pick up the phone and "dial," we're paying for
>> the ability to reach people, not just empty dial-tone.
> The USF worked great until the Clinton administration re-purposed it
> to buy computers for rural schools. Now it's just another tax.
>
> Before that, the basic idea was that every phone line paid in a fixed
> amount every month and then when a phone company installed an
> expensive rural line, they recovered the excess cost from the fund.
> This made high-density urban lines cost neutral compared to low
> density rural lines, making rural service desirable for the service
> provider.
>
>
Agree - a better idea in theory than practice.
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
