[172674] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cheap LSN/CGN/NAT444 Solution
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Dobbins)
Mon Jun 30 09:06:13 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <53B15B27.7060803@per.reau.lt>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:05:58 +0700
To: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Jun 30, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt> wrote:
> Why? Cause that (per-subscriber limits on ports and memory) is exactly =
what we recommend in RFC 6888...
<https://app.box.com/s/a3oqqlgwe15j8svojvzl>
I can't tell you how many times I've received frantic 4AM calls about =
NATted wireless networks going down due to this sort of thing. It's a =
real problem.
Also, there are horizontal behaviors which are undesirable, as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Equo ne credite, Teucri.
-- Laoco=F6n
