[172554] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (stovetop 202)
Mon Jun 23 17:22:00 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:21:52 -0700
From: stovetop 202 <stovetop_202@yahoo.com>
To: Michael O Holstein <michael.holstein@csuohio.edu>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <1403553906798.14718@csuohio.edu>
Reply-To: stovetop 202 <stovetop_202@yahoo.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
What do you mean by if anyone can see it?=0AThe lines are now closed off fr=
om the public's view.. but the textbooks still teach you that you should be=
able to have access freely. =A0Is it the data on the hard line that you're=
worried people can see?=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Monday, June 23, 2014 4:05 PM, Mi=
chael O Holstein <michael.holstein@csuohio.edu> wrote:=0A =0A=0A=0AShort an=
swer,=0A=0AYes .. provided you don't care if anyone can see it.=0A=0ATake a=
look at what NEW.NET tried with DNS back in the day.=0A=0ACheers,=0A=0AMic=
hael Holstein=0ACleveland State University=0A______________________________=
__________=0A=0AFrom: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of stovetop=
202 <stovetop_202@yahoo.com>=0ASent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 7:45 PM=0ATo: n=
anog@nanog.org=0ASubject: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World=0A=
=0ATopic: ICANN Vs. The World.=0A=0AThe question at hand is.. Do countries/=
businesses have to affiliate or utilize any of those services provided by I=
CANN other than the assignment of an IP address?=A0 And can you get away wi=
th LAN/CAN/MAN stand-alone systems [instead of utilizing DNS-via-ICANN]??=
=0AExample:=0AIs it legal to cut off those DNS systems and loop in backward=
s?=A0 (instead of bidirectional).=A0 **=A0 I don't want my city/schools/oth=
er systems hooked into the World Wide Web. // someone let me know when you =
get a chance.
