[172537] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sun Jun 22 21:39:09 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <00a601cf8d9a$a35461d0$e9fd2570$@iname.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:41:24 -0700
To: Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This looks somewhat promising:
http://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/R7000/R7000_DS_vA_19Mar14.pdf
~$200
If you want something cheaper, this:
=
http://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/R6300V2/R6300v2_DS_20Jun13.pdf
is about $100.
I haven=92t tried either of these myself yet, but other Netgear home =
products with IPv6 support have worked reasonably well in my experience =
and these are newer generation and do list IPv6 support in their data =
sheets.
There may be cheaper models. I haven=92t done any sort of thorough =
investigation.
Of course the Apple Airport Express and Airport Extreme models also have =
802.11ac support and known good IPv6 implementations.
Owen
On Jun 21, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com> wrote:
> I'm looking for a new consumer router to offer our customers that has =
GigE ports and supports IEEE 802.11ac, and all the products that our =
reseller and their partners have suggested don't have IPv6 Ready =
certification or the vendor can't confirm they meet RIPE's 554 document. =
D-Link has a long list of approved products, but I chose to stop using =
their products for other reasons. If any can recommend a mid-range =
consumer router that you think would meet our needs, please drop me a =
note off-list.
>=20
> Frank
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Gary =
Buhrmaster
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 9:41 PM
> To: Owen DeLong
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
>=20
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> .....
>> Ideally, it would be nice if the UNH/IOL and/or CEA could come up =
with a meaningful definition of IPv6 support and a logo to go with it =
that we could tell consumers to look for on the box. Ideally, this would =
be a set of standards that users of the logo agree to abide by rather =
than a fee-based testing regime that excludes smaller players.
>=20
> You mean something like the IPv6 Ready logo at =
http://www.ipv6ready.org ?
>=20
