[172534] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Sat Jun 21 17:54:36 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: "'Gary Buhrmaster'" <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com>,
"Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMfXtQyJvMt4FaOrsB79XK0s+c+_iFLDq10eDEZkkYikyR_Zdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:49:11 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I'm looking for a new consumer router to offer our customers that has =
GigE ports and supports IEEE 802.11ac, and all the products that our =
reseller and their partners have suggested don't have IPv6 Ready =
certification or the vendor can't confirm they meet RIPE's 554 document. =
D-Link has a long list of approved products, but I chose to stop using =
their products for other reasons. If any can recommend a mid-range =
consumer router that you think would meet our needs, please drop me a =
note off-list.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Gary =
Buhrmaster
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 9:41 PM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
.....
> Ideally, it would be nice if the UNH/IOL and/or CEA could come up with =
a meaningful definition of IPv6 support and a logo to go with it that we =
could tell consumers to look for on the box. Ideally, this would be a =
set of standards that users of the logo agree to abide by rather than a =
fee-based testing regime that excludes smaller players.
You mean something like the IPv6 Ready logo at http://www.ipv6ready.org =
?
