[172507] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gary Buhrmaster)
Thu Jun 19 22:41:16 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4C91045B-6C3C-4383-88EE-BE52376BBF15@delong.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 02:41:07 +0000
From: Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
.....
> Ideally, it would be nice if the UNH/IOL and/or CEA could come up with a =
meaningful definition of IPv6 support and a logo to go with it that we coul=
d tell consumers to look for on the box. Ideally, this would be a set of st=
andards that users of the logo agree to abide by rather than a fee-based te=
sting regime that excludes smaller players.
You mean something like the IPv6 Ready logo at http://www.ipv6ready.org ?
