[17250] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: INTERNIC Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Rishaw)
Thu May 28 11:48:50 1998
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980528070230.2972A-100000@thuule.pair.com> from Adam Rothschild at "May 28, 98 07:04:32 am"
To: asr@millburn.net (Adam Rothschild)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 10:44:19 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: alex@nac.net, nanog@merit.org
From: jamie@dilbert.ais.net (James Rishaw)
Reply-To: jamie@ais.net
Adam Rothschild wrote:
> > 1) Should the Internic be retaining this X Headers?
>
> Why not just put your tracking info in the message body, *before* the
> InterNIC template? That WILL be retained, and the reg process will
> proceed normally.
I put data in section 1. Nobody ever reads it. (Seriously).
Section 1 is always retained. :)
The second way to track is, put the domain name in the subject. Now, when
you get the final back, the domain name is in the subject anyhow.. so if
you just write something to parse it, you're okay.
--
jamie rishaw (dal/efnet:gavroche) American Information Systems, Inc.
rdm: "Religion is obsolete." gsr: "By what?" jgr: "Solaris." (1996)
Tel:312.425.7140, FAX:312.425.7240
