[172484] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barry Shein)
Thu Jun 19 16:00:10 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:59:34 -0400
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaa=oa4kMvCibZOpiw1QDUM8jaXVb4WDVSqXHXw8UtopaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
But I thought ICANN was supposed to be the new and future nexus for
all things internet governance?
On June 19, 2014 at 13:57 morrowc.lists@gmail.com (Christopher Morrow) wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> wrote:
> >
> > Really. You're really completely discounting ICANN in having any
> > leadership or participative role in the IPv4/IPv6 transition?
> >
>
> What leadership position have you seen them take ASIDE from marketing
> (in the last 2-3 yrs, but most of that has been ISOC not ICANN
> directly) in the last 5 yrs or so?
>
> -chris
--
-Barry Shein
The World | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
