[172475] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Edward Arthurs)
Thu Jun 19 14:43:10 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Edward Arthurs" <earthurs@legacyinmate.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLab96K8tnGH_yaaGzR3FMO3s1B60fR0StjEaOwGZdkonOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:32:28 -0700
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
You are correct, but this is the tip of the iceberg as other =
configurations will need to come into play as pointed out by several =
people on this thread.
This learning curve is not impossible, if the net admin really applies =
his/her self to learning it.
Thank You
-----Original Message-----
From: christopher.morrow@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.morrow@gmail.com] =
On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 11:22 AM
To: Edward Arthurs
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Edward Arthurs =
<earthurs@legacyinmate.com> wrote:
> The difference between IPV4 and IPV6 for someone not familiar is huge, =
> 1. There is a totally new format dotted decimal to colon.
> 2. The 32 bit to 128 bit is/or can be quite challenging for some net =
admins.
these seem like the smallest of v6 problems, actually... and I would =
bet:
http://getipv6.info
would be helpful (eventually when small/mid-sized businesses start =
trying to transition)
