[172450] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Huff)
Thu Jun 19 10:53:08 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com>
To: Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org>, Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com>, 'Jared Mauch'
<jared@puck.nether.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:52:58 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CFC85563.5F4C0%Lee@asgard.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Doesn't surprise me at all. Another thing I've seen lately is number of sof=
tware (especially system management software) after being certified/tested =
with IPv6 no longer function when IPv6 is enabled. At least one vendor that=
broke IPv6 with a recent patch told me they only tested it once for IPv6 c=
ompatibility to get the marketing folks off their neck. After that, they no=
longer test with IPv6 since they don't have IPv6 internally.
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Lee Howard
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 8:54 AM
To: Frank Bulk; 'Jared Mauch'
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
On 6/17/14 11:43 PM, "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com> wrote:
>These sites used to be dual-stacked:
>www.cablelabs.com (over 180 days ago via ipv6.cablelabs.com)
>www.att.net (over 44 days ago)
>www.charter.com (over 151 days)
>www.globalcrossing.com (over 802 days)
>www.timewarnercable.com (over 593 days)
Check that one again.
Surprised you didn't mention www.bing.com.
Lee
