[1724] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@ISI.EDU)
Tue Jan 30 12:04:34 1996
From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
To: freedman@netaxs.com (Avi Freedman)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199601270623.BAA07134@netaxs.com> from "Avi Freedman" at Jan 27, 96 01:23:22 am
>
> >
> >
> > I can't speak for Matthew, but many smallish ISPs have legacy /24
> > allocations from using Livingston Portmasters and IRXes before they
> > could do CIDR (I *think* they solved that problem, but I don't know
> > for sure).
> >
> > -george
> >
>
> I think the problem was with variable-sized subnets within a /24, not
> with subnetting at all, but I could be wrong.
>
Please review RFC 1879 for the particulars on certain
existing equipment providers and their abilities to
support near-term addresing proposals.
--
--bill
