[172392] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Jun 17 20:49:55 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <32832593.4076.1403046439981.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:46:30 -0700
To: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


On Jun 17, 2014, at 16:07 , Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net>
>=20
>> It does ring a bit hollow that these sites haven't gotten there when
>> others (Google, Facebook) have already shown you can publish AAAA
>> records with no adverse public impact.=20
>=20
> "no" adverse impact?
>=20
> Seems to me I've seen a few threads go by the last few years that =
suggested
> that there were a few pathological cases where having the 4A record =
was=20
> worse than not...

Yes, currently less than 0.05% of end users and usually because they =
have misconfigured systems that think they have IPv6 access when they =
really don't.

One could make a valid argument that this is no worse than systems with =
misconfigured IPv4 who cannot reach Google at all even if they don't =
publish AAAA records because their IPv4 is so badly misconfigured that =
it doesn't work either. I suspect it may well be approximately the same =
fraction of systems, though it may take longer to notice/resolve the =
IPv6 issues than the IPv4 ones.

Owen


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post