[172371] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Tue Jun 17 16:13:31 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <53A09D46.7000507@Janoszka.pl>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:13:19 -0700
To: Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz@Janoszka.pl>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Apple-Mail=_B3F366C5-7DB1-4F4D-8A4C-CD95B32C3D4E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
On Jun 17, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz@Janoszka.pl> =
wrote:
> There are still applications that break with subnet smaller than /64, =
so all VPS providers probably have to use /64 addressing.
Wouldn't that argue for /64s?
> /64 for one customer seems to be too much,
In what way? What are you trying to protect against? It can't be address =
exhaustion (there are 2,305,843,009,213,693,952 possible /64s in the =
currently used format specifier. If there are 1,000,000,000 customer =
assignments every day of the year, the current format specifier will =
last over 6 million years).
Regards,
-drc
--Apple-Mail=_B3F366C5-7DB1-4F4D-8A4C-CD95B32C3D4E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJToKFfAAoJENV6ebf0/4rXohAH/1T0F2pTarEYjI6Nhy/kBj/V
FrU4uAyqA1rRJ38gmhouMYwz57mwWz5jpNxBXP2PgfnHta4y8HpQVqLpSzMjuxSZ
rfAPgfKcOt7mmXHs00mKEs9phu3j6RSJiKtUr1i9+4n+q4IRTGKhWMSV+4+C5IeB
B0SP07+EV1EJxQpHAs6VxMLGYGSR4rD/mGqdYBoRkc/oOxmHQ6sewqA4VzD+sGyu
ZgnSRrBnnpq2zirj51UShpEhY5ZuQZ0Lt8EPP2qRfHOw4B73A0CiJq+jWoTpKxGW
vVMRiQ0hjdFqIsH5gL8LGl3qbvX9GK8nwAsCuI2xyQMpEfuWu1FrxfApZwzRx2s=
=DqOb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_B3F366C5-7DB1-4F4D-8A4C-CD95B32C3D4E--
