[172236] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: richard@bennett.com has shared Cable companies astroturfing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Fri Jun 6 20:37:06 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <53925BCF.70707@bennett.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 20:36:56 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Richard:
While you & I don't have the best relationship ever, I would not - and =
did not - do anything of the sort. I'm a little more, let's say, blunt =
about my displeasures. You don't have to believe me, but those are the =
facts.
Also, just to be clear again, I have zero problem with pointing out the =
impersonation, I was questioning the "speculators" part. I.e. You =
implied you would not send that, and I wondered why you wouldn't. But =
since you think it is off-topic (and I did not), that's a perfectly =
valid reason not to send such posts. Thank you for clearing it up.
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
On Jun 06, 2014, at 20:24 , Richard Bennett <richard@bennett.com> wrote:
> I wanted the NANOG community to know that someone is impersonating me. =
I don't send off-topic links from dodgy blogs to email lists.
>=20
> I now have a pretty good idea as to who the impersonator is; it seems =
that Gilmore has too much time on his hands.
>=20
> RB
>=20
> On 6/6/14, 5:06 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> I believe I listed 3.
>>=20
>> And there are multiple times I have posted similar items in the past.
>>=20
>> Just curious about the "speculators" thing. But I think we're =
off-topic, so apologies to the audience for extra email in their =
inboxes. I've sent reply-to to my personal address to avoid this blowing =
up (although I don't know if mailman will respect that).
>>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Richard Bennett
> Visiting Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
> Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy
> Editor, High Tech Forum
>=20
