[172032] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT IP and Google
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Wed May 21 19:20:58 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTv30Ytp-kNq0ckqWc6Fc9tw-bptJO68YRp9A6TPJYrLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:17:57 -0700
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On May 21, 2014 4:17 PM, "Ca By" <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On May 21, 2014 4:04 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:21:12 +1200, "Tony Wicks" said:
> >
> > > Deploy v6... yes its very easy to replace every CPE device that every
home
> > > user has... really ? come on, back in the real world that is just not
going
> > > to happen until by default every CPE device has the capability as
default.
> > > Dual stack with CGNAT is the only real solution that works today.
> >
> > And if 5 years ago you had *started* distributing CPE that did v6, and
by now
> > you had 40% of your customer with CPE that did it, you'd need a 40%
smaller CGN
> > to fix your Google problem..
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Verizon Wireless is at 50% ipv6 penetration, T-Mobile US and Comcast are
closing in on 30%
>
> It's a non-trivial number of eyeballs. And, FB, Google / Youtube , and
Netflix are all native ipv6 ...its a lot of cotent too.
>
> CB
Citation
http://www.worldipv6launch.org/verizon-wireless-breaks-through-50-ipv6-and-still-climbing/
