[172030] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT IP and Google
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed May 21 19:02:27 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Tony Wicks" <tony@wicks.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 May 2014 09:21:12 +1200."
<005701cf753a$97d6e670$c784b350$@wicks.co.nz>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 19:01:42 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1400713301_53758P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:21:12 +1200, "Tony Wicks" said:
> Deploy v6... yes its very easy to replace every CPE device that every home
> user has... really ? come on, back in the real world that is just not going
> to happen until by default every CPE device has the capability as default.
> Dual stack with CGNAT is the only real solution that works today.
And if 5 years ago you had *started* distributing CPE that did v6, and by now
you had 40% of your customer with CPE that did it, you'd need a 40% smaller CGN
to fix your Google problem..
--==_Exmh_1400713301_53758P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=SEHP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1400713301_53758P--