|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:43:08 -0400 From: Jean-Francois Mezei <jfmezei_nanog@vaxination.ca> To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <1400175340_128176@surgemail.mnsi.net> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org Many thanks for the answers so far. On 14-05-15 13:35, Clayton Zekelman wrote: >>The assertion that ONTs have built-in routing capabilities has been >>challenged. > > By who? A rather large company in Canada whose name contains the last name of the inventor of the Telephone :-) (actually from their Atlantic Canada arm). I know that Bell Canada's FTTH deployment includes a Sagemcom VDSL modem after the ONT. It uses it as plain router in FTTH because it supports twin VLANs (one for internet and other for IPTV) and I guess they figured it would be easier to standarize on a single router across its DSL and FTTH footprint. Not sure what Bell Aliant uses. My argument had been that in a wholesale context, the Sagemcom must not be included when wholesale service since it is not necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |