[1718] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Elz)
Tue Jan 30 08:13:58 1996
To: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:02:46 CDT."
<199601301302.FAA06195@lint.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 00:12:14 +1100
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:02:46 -0500
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <199601301302.FAA06195@lint.cisco.com>
[cc: trimmed to nanog]
Which I'm not on... (not that that matters here, this
is about ended).
Let's just agree that without strong end-to-end encryption, its
all swiss cheese. :-)
Yes, though with the caveat that without static addresses
the cheese is rather rank, and suitable for nothing at all,
with static addresses (relaly stable known addresses) so
filtering is possible at least a little first level protection
is possible.
kre
