[171679] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick Boutilier)
Fri May 9 00:52:31 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:51:34 -0300
From: Patrick Boutilier <boutilpj@ednet.ns.ca>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CACTmXQUYL+zWU=YeFkDx5Mwpcktyn0tofywPREbTCKVUVE1fTg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080301080505010507070308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 05/08/2014 01:46 PM, Shawn L wrote:
> With all the talk lately about the growth in routes, I got to thinking
> about upgrading the memory in a couple of my routers.
>
> Does anyone have experience using third-party "guaranteed compatible"
> memory.
>
> With Cisco's discount it looks like I can upgrade for $5k vs $700 with
> third party memory. I'm just wondering if others have used it, and how it's
> performed, or if it isn't worth the risk.
>
> thanks
>
No direct experience with Cisco but we used to use Kingston memory in
Dell servers without any issues.
--------------080301080505010507070308
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8;
name="boutilpj.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="boutilpj.vcf"
YmVnaW46dmNhcmQNCmZuOlBhdHJpY2sgQm91dGlsaWVyDQpuOkJvdXRpbGllcjtQYXRyaWNr
DQpvcmc6O05vdmEgU2NvdGlhIERlcGFydG1lbnQgb2YgRWR1Y2F0aW9uDQphZHI6OzsyMDIx
IEJydW5zd2ljayBTdHJlZXQ7SGFsaWZheDtOUztCM0sgMlk1O0NhbmFkYQ0KZW1haWw7aW50
ZXJuZXQ6Ym91dGlscGpAZWRuZXQubnMuY2ENCnRpdGxlOldBTiBDb21tdW5pY2F0aW9ucyBT
cGVjaWFsaXN0DQp0ZWw7d29yazo5MDItNDI0LTY4MDANCnRlbDtmYXg6OTAyLTQyNC0wODc0
DQp2ZXJzaW9uOjIuMQ0KZW5kOnZjYXJkDQoNCg==
--------------080301080505010507070308--
