[171638] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nikolay Shopik)
Thu May 8 03:35:26 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Nikolay Shopik <shopik@inblock.ru>
In-Reply-To: <CACTmXQW4q2CYFXC0YiW4sBtpn9Kjh_s5L9umC-0TPN5eVt=60g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 10:15:26 +0400
To: Shawn L <shawnl@up.net>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Asr1002-f may have problem as it limited to 512k iirc
> On 08 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=8F 2014 =D0=B3., at 2:45, Shawn L <shawnl@up.net> wr=
ote:
>=20
> Do the ASR1k routers have this issue as well? I searched around but
> couldn't find any information.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Irwin, Kevin <Kevin.Irwin@cinbell.com>
> Date: Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for
> 6500/7600 routers.
> To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
>=20
>=20
> I=C2=B9m really surprised that most people have not hit this limit already=
,
> especially on the 9K=C2=B9s, as it seems Cisco has some fuzzy math when it=
> comes to the 512K limit.
>=20
> Also make sure you have spare cards when you reload after changing the
> scaling, those old cards don=C2=B9t always like to come back.
>=20
>> On 5/6/14, 7:01 PM, "Larry Sheldon" <LarrySheldon@cox.net> wrote:
>>=20
>>> On 5/6/2014 10:39 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Just something to think about before it becomes a story the community
>>> talks about for the next decade.
>>=20
>> Like we have for the last two?
>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>> Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
>> of System Administrators:
>> Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
>> learn from their mistakes.
>> (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
>=20
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive
> this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this
> document.
