[171613] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Irwin, Kevin)
Wed May 7 18:02:42 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Irwin, Kevin" <Kevin.Irwin@cinbell.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:39:26 +0000
In-Reply-To: <536969E5.6080608@cox.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I=B9m really surprised that most people have not hit this limit already,
especially on the 9K=B9s, as it seems Cisco has some fuzzy math when it
comes to the 512K limit.
Also make sure you have spare cards when you reload after changing the
scaling, those old cards don=B9t always like to come back.
On 5/6/14, 7:01 PM, "Larry Sheldon" <LarrySheldon@cox.net> wrote:
>On 5/6/2014 10:39 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
>
>> Just something to think about before it becomes a story the community
>> talks about for the next decade.
>
>Like we have for the last two?
>
>
>--
>Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
> of System Administrators:
>Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
> learn from their mistakes.
> (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to wh=
ich it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material=
. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of a=
ny action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other t=
han the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, ple=
ase contact the sender and destroy any copies of this document.
