[171596] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: US patent 5473599
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Henning Brauer)
Wed May 7 02:34:32 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 08:34:23 +0200
From: Henning Brauer <hb-nanog@bsws.de>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <6B7FA690-F25D-462D-9521-50AC5323ECD4@virtualized.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
* David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> [2014-05-07 00:21]:
> The fact that OpenBSD developers continue to defend this choice is
> one reason why I won't run OpenBSD (or CARP).=20
We won't miss you.
And besides, you're running plenty of our code every day. It's probaby
in your pocket right now.
> > Any complaints for Google using the https port 443 for SPDY?
> AFAIK, the use of SPDY does not preclude the use of HTTPS on the same
> network.
The use of CARP does not preclude the use of VRRP on the same network
either.
> The fact that in addition to the OpenBSD developers choosing
> to use 112, they also chose to use the MAC addresses used for VRRP,
> thus making it impossible to run both VRRP and CARP on the same network
> due to MAC address conflicts would suggest you might want to pick a
> better analogy.=20
How about checking your facts before making wrong claims next time?
carp and vrrp work prefectly fine next to each other on the same
network.
I explained what lead to the mac addr at least twice right in this
thread. Amazing how many people here apparently have text
understanding issues.
--=20
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, AG Hamburg HRB 128289, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, VMs/PVS, Application Hosting
