[171560] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Residential CPE suggestions

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bedard.phil@gmail.com)
Tue May 6 08:08:41 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, <jared@puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)>
From: <bedard.phil@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 08:08:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201405060701.s4671Xp4067636@aurora.sol.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

It uses a Cavium Octeon processor which does have dedicated HW packet proce=
ssing.  A moderate number of  prefixes won't slow it down doing vanilla for=
warding, not sure about 2 million though...  I believe they have recently o=
ptimized some of the FW stuff to take advantage of the HW as well. =20

Layering services like FW, NAT, and tunneling definitely drops the packet r=
ate significantly, but it is still capable of 100+Mbps at IMIX packet sizes=
.=20

I think there are a couple of in depth tests out there.

In my experience the ERL works really well for a $99 device.=20

Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: "Joe Greco" <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
Sent: =E2=80=8E5/=E2=80=8E6/=E2=80=8E2014 7:39 AM
To: "jared@puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)" <jared@puck.nether.net (Jared Mau=
ch)>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Residential CPE suggestions

> I was also going to recommend the EdgeRouter Pro as it has dual SFP =3D
> ports and the Vyatta/Linux stuff works quite well.
>=20
> I suspect you will be very surprised with the quality experience.  If =3D
> you've not used Vyatta, it's very JunOS-like.

Does anyone have any practical experience with the EdgeRouter with a
largish number of prefixes?

http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgeRouter_DS.pdf

The "2 million+ packets per second" leads me to believe that this is
merely a highly optimized software based router, but under "Hardware
Specs" it specifically says "hardware acceleration for packet=20
processing".

I have no idea what's being accelerated since the "layer 3 forwarding
performance" specs for the FR-8 are 2Mpps (an 800MHz CPU) and the=20
FRPro-8 are 2.4Mpps (1GHz) which suggests software lookup.

Do these things suffer if you load them down with a full table?  Or
a handful of firewall rules?

... JG
--=20
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then=
 I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(=
CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apple=
s.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post