[171426] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: We hit half-million: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charles Gucker)
Tue Apr 29 03:50:25 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <3883.1398739149@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:45:41 -0400
From: Charles Gucker <cgucker@onesc.net>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:39 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:59:43 -0400, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
> > > On Apr 28, 2014, at 19:41, Chris Boyd <cboyd@gizmopartners.com> wrote:
> > > I'm in the middle of a physical move. I promise I'll take the 3
> deagg'd
> > > /24s out as soon as I can.
> > Do not laugh. If everyone who had 3 de-agg'ed prefixes fixed it, the
> table
> > would drop precipitously. We all have to do our part.
>
> Do we have a handle on what percent of the de-aggrs are legitimate attempts
> at TE, and what percent are just whoopsies that should be re-aggregated?
>
And of those TE routes, how many can be suppressed by way of BGP
Communities with their respective upstream providers ...
charles
