[171248] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: nanong list spam filtering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael DeMan)
Thu Apr 24 04:41:32 2014
From: Michael DeMan <nanog@deman.com>
In-Reply-To: <842F7C0E-CA61-4490-B5DF-ECC60D9A25FC@deman.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 01:40:59 -0700
To: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I take this back.
Spam I received was not via anybody sending to/from nanog@nanog.org but =
rather directly to my subscribed e-mail address.
- Mike
On Apr 24, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Michael DeMan <nanog@deman.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>=20
> Sorry being a bit off-topic and having a boring subject, but we really =
should clean up whatever has been going on with so much spam hitting =
this mailing list.
>=20
>=20
> NO - I am complaining about people who post things I disagree with or =
on topics I have little interest in, I am tired of the stuff like...
> subject: Top rated...wireless security cameras--for both indoor & =
outdoor
> subject: Save on: Hawaii, vacation packages
> (classic) subject: Compare: the best, email marketing services
> subject: Cards reward plans\rates =
compared(MC-Capital1-Venture-ChaseFreedom-Citicard-BankAmericard-Discover-=
Visa)
> ...and what not.
>=20
>=20
> Has it always been the policy perhaps that this mailing list does no =
spam filtering whatsoever? If so that would be understandable.
>=20
> Meanwhile I think would be better for the community if at least some =
of the most egregious and obvious stuff did not have cpu and network =
cycles spent forwarding it onwards?
> As always, I could imagine that although I think this is simple it =
could be a politically charged debate.
>=20
> Cheers and please fix if possible,
> - Michael DeMan
>=20
