[171106] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Perreault)
Fri Apr 18 13:43:00 2014
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:40:26 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGVevjt4upAtt9bvbWjmARkL7=_D4L38OuBqSs1J69tLkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Le 2014-04-18 13:35, William Herrin a écrit :
>> Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT?
>>
>> Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to all
>> IPv6 firewalls.
>
> Your document specifies "Enterprise" firewalls. Frankly I think that's
> wise. Consumer and enterprise users have very different needs and very
> different cost points.
Over here we have no use for IPv6 NAT. We have our own PI space. I
suspect many other enterprises would be in a similar situation.
I totally get your position, but I don't see how it can justify an
Internet-wide requirement.
Simon
