[171103] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Perreault)
Fri Apr 18 13:31:45 2014
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:31:20 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon@per.reau.lt>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAN3um4xY-jtZ23--yBMy=WfjH1kzhgQ2+2DLn8=MNAcuE-ZdKA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Le 2014-04-18 13:25, Mike Hale a écrit :
> I agree with Bill. You can poopoo NAT all you want, but it's a fact
> of most networks and will continue to remain so until you can make a
> compelling case to move away from it.
Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT?
Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to all
IPv6 firewalls.
Simon
