[171101] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Timothy Morizot)
Fri Apr 18 13:16:15 2014
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGXia-YLnN0LN8FrQnQFC7gRQMbbiGXh=OLK+4cz02p+Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:15:39 -0500
From: Timothy Morizot <tmorizot@gmail.com>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Cc: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs@tools.ietf.org, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 18, 2014 10:04 AM, "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
> That's correct: you don't understand. Until you do, just accept: there
> are more than a few folks who want to, intend to and will use NAT for
> IPv6. They will wait until NAT is available in their preferred
> products before making any significant deployment efforts.
Actually, the few like you will hold off until they are behind the curve,
then scramble to catch up. Good luck with that strategy!
