[171074] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Thu Apr 17 14:53:36 2014
In-Reply-To: <CALgc3C6v_u3Xrjf1rQ=u+62ctExOEfYWUsor-DzfamLVv+z+uA@mail.gmail.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:50:01 -0400
To: Eugeniu Patrascu <eugen@imacandi.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>,
"draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs@tools.ietf.org"
<draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-firewall-reqs@tools.ietf.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu <eugen@imacandi.net> wrote:
> It's a bigger risk to think that NAT somehow magically protects you against
> stuff on the Internet.
You are entitled to your opinion and you are entitled to run your
network in accordance with your opinion.
To vendors who would sell me product, I would respectfully suggest
that attempts to forcefully educate me as to what I *should want*
offers neither a short nor particularly successful path to closing a
sale.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
