[170996] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: DMARC -> CERT?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miles Fidelman)
Mon Apr 14 18:05:54 2014

Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:53:15 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
CC: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <0D1AA11E-F1ED-495C-8E41-CC85A5E24A3D@ufp.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> Ultimately the way to reduce spam is to catch spammers, prosecute them,
> and put them in prison.  The way we keep all of those other crimes low
> is primarily by enforcement; making the punishment not worth the crime.
> With spam, the chance that a spammer will be punished is infinitesimal.
> There are hundreds, or thousands, or tens of thousands of spammers for
> every one that is put into jail.

Follow their money trails and take their bank accounts. Counterpunch 
with DDoS attacks.  Attack them with drones.

We're investing a lot of tax dollars into offensive cybersecurity - 
let's give those guys some practice!

Makes sense to me!



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post