|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:56:09 -0700 From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> To: Jim Popovitch <jimpop@gmail.com>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGfsgR0jYn0uRuhtAE8bQoAsjQOhHeJ8wZLQiRPqAZtzg5-kjQ@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On 4/12/2014 2:38 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Miles Fidelman > <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote: > someone needs to get a legal opinion wrt > the DMARC group's effort to have all mailinglists change their From: > address. "The DMARC group" (presumably referring to the dmarc.org informal consortium that created DMARC) is conducting no such effort. The action taken this past week was an independent effort by Yahoo. dmarc.org had nothing to do with it. The DMARC specification is quite clear about the limitations of its use. Nothing is aided by the confusing the very basic different between a specification and the choices actors make in applying it. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |