[170836] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGPMON Alert Questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Apr 10 06:31:16 2014
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:30:51 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
In-Reply-To: <201404101210.19987.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
as folk start to roll out rejection of invalids, we might think about
how we report problems with folk registering inadequate roas, covering
their customers, covering their deaggs (maybe deaggs get what they
deserve), etc. if they are not clued enough to generate prudent roas,
they will not be clued enough to generate ghostbusters (and neither
ripe's nor apnic's software supports gbrs today).
if my customer can not reach foo's customer, will foo's rir be willing
to help? if foo's customer can not reach mine, how to let foo know who
to call/write? do we need conventions?
randy
