[170777] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Tue Apr 8 21:00:28 2014
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 17:59:32 -0700
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Me <jschiel@flowtools.net>
In-Reply-To: <53448CBD.7060205@flowtools.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:56:45PM -0600, Me wrote:
>
> On 04/08/2014 10:16 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >Lots of tools available. I'm with ferg, surprised more haven't been mentioned here.
> >
> >Tools to check for the bug:
> > • on your own box: https://github.com/musalbas/heartbleed-masstest/blob/master/ssltest.py
> > • online: http://filippo.io/Heartbleed/ (use carefully as they might log what you check)
> > • online: http://possible.lv/tools/hb/
> > • offline: https://github.com/tdussa/heartbleed-masstest <--- Tobias Dussa, also Takes a CSV file with host names for input and ports as parameter
> > • offline: http://s3.jspenguin.org/ssltest.py
> > • offline: https://github.com/titanous/heartbleeder
> >
> >List of vulnerable Linux distributions: <http://www.circl.lu/pub/tr-21/>.
> >
> >Anyone have any more?
> >
> Thanks for the expanded list, I had some of these already. I'm not
> comfortable in letting some online code that I can't see test my
> site though.
>
> --John
or, there is this: http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git
/bill
