[170756] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGPMON Alert Questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jac Kloots)
Tue Apr 8 07:20:49 2014
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:20:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jac Kloots <Jac.Kloots@surfnet.nl>
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
In-Reply-To: <201404081249.13834.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Mark,
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:24:07 AM Jac Kloots wrote:
>
>> We (SURFnet, AS1103) are in the same position and I wrote
>> an article about the evaluation we did before deciding
>> on dropping invalids (https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=3159)
>
> Sounds great, Jac!
>
> In your report, you mention that you're not validating
> customer prefixes. Is this still the case?
Yes, we don't validate those prefixes cause we filter them strict. We know
from all our customers which prefixes they use so we have prefix-filters
placed on all their connections.
Jac
--
Jac Kloots
Network Services
SURFnet bv
