[170726] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGPMON Alert Questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sharon Goldberg)
Fri Apr 4 11:52:57 2014
In-Reply-To: <CAJHGrrRF3zKwx7T7vQORx1xjqV8YDqMAWbJf4V0yU6Dvw56BdQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sharon Goldberg <goldbe@cs.bu.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:51:45 -0400
To: "mark.tinka" <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>,
Frank Bulk <fbulk@mypremieronline.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Sharon Goldberg <goldbe@cs.bu.edu> wrote>
>
>
> Actually, since this is NANOG, might as well ask:
>
> Do you all view filtering your downstream's downstreams as much more
> difficult than filtering only downstreams, or only stub ASes? Do you have
> a sense for how many networks filter only their direct downstreams but no
> further, versus those that also filter downstreams downstreams?
>
I set up a quick anonymous survey (2 questions) to gather some info on
this.
If you have a minute, go here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1x6Bbe7OYvuWeOzO8xpxbIZzW3N14wI1SVVbQer4FSa4/viewform
We will share our anonymized results on NANOG.
Thanks,
Sharon
