![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: 29 Mar 2014 22:40:48 -0400 From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> To: "Matthew Petach" <mpetach@netflight.com> In-Reply-To: <CAEmG1=qr385bX234Gb2qMgwZnvC-GDYdZFVm=S6ZbsLwnHMEMQ@mail.gmail.com> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org > The numbers you list in your argument against a micropayment > system being able to function are a fraction of the number of > transactions Facebook deals with in updating newsfeeds for > the billion+ users on their system.[0] ... which is completely irrelevant because they don't have a double spending problem. Sheesh. It's easy to scale up stuff that is trivially parallelizable.* Also, I wrote that ten years ago. Add an extra zero or two to the numbers if you want, but it doesn't make any difference. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly * - a term of art, look it up
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |