[170505] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Mar 28 09:42:58 2014
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Mar 2014 06:22:32 -0700."
<715CE67A-5538-48BB-B91B-F4708EA3CD0D@delong.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:41:22 -0400
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1396014082_2057P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 06:22:32 -0700, Owen DeLong said:
> This assumes a different economic model of SPAM that I have been lead to
> believe exists.
> My understanding is that the people sending the SPAM get paid immediately and
> that the people paying them to send it are the ones hoping that the advertising/
> phishing/etc. are acted on.
Only because we haven't given them a way to monetize it immediately.
--==_Exmh_1396014082_2057P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=zS5P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1396014082_2057P--
