[170357] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Mar 26 15:04:45 2014
To: Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:07:22 -0400."
<5332DF1A.9040001@pari.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:59:47 -0400
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1395860387_2059P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:07:22 -0400, Lamar Owen said:
> it; get enough endusers with this problem and you'll get a class-action
> suit against OS vendors that allow the problem to remain a problem; you
> can get rid of the bots.
You *do* realize that the OS vendor can't really do much about users who click
on stuff they shouldn't, or reply to phishing emails, or most of the other
ways people *actually* get pwned these days?
Hint: Microsoft *tried* to fix this with UAC. The users rioted.
--==_Exmh_1395860387_2059P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=Gidl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1395860387_2059P--
