[170311] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Finch)
Wed Mar 26 06:30:46 2014
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:30:12 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo@heliacal.net>
In-Reply-To: <04EE0477-BBE2-47B5-ABAE-9F62887E5F4B@heliacal.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo@heliacal.net> wrote:
> The usefulness of reverse DNS in IPv6 is dubious.
For most systems yes, but you might as well have it if you are manually
allocating server addresses.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Faeroes: Variable 4, becoming southeast 5 or 6. Moderate or rough. Fair. Good.
