[170089] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: misunderstanding scale
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Mon Mar 24 02:48:02 2014
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:47:39 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20140323231527.50DC711B49E0@rock.dv.isc.org>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart1539950.UCyXAqQIJW
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Monday, March 24, 2014 01:15:27 AM Mark Andrews wrote:
> And there you go putting stricter requirements on
> printers that you don't put on laptop, servers. None of
> us would put any machines on the net if they had to meet
> your printer's requirements.
Because, at the very least, a laptop or server can run a=20
stateless packet filter to keep out pokes at ports that may=20
be running by default, but have no business being queried=20
over the network.
Mark.
--nextPart1539950.UCyXAqQIJW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=SUan
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1539950.UCyXAqQIJW--
