[170082] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: arin representation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Mon Mar 24 00:40:59 2014
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@medline.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:40:27 +0000
In-Reply-To: <9578293AE169674F9A048B2BC9A081B4B5421B35@MUNPRDMBXA1.medline.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 24, 2014, at 12:20 PM, "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@medline.com> wrote=
:
>=20
> Exactly right John. I think the term "owned" is a problem here.
>=20
> It seems to me that the terms would correctly be "holder" or who the addr=
ess space was issued to or "user" being the end user using that space.
We use address holder to recognize the party with the rights to the address=
block.
> Wouldn't all of the holders be ARIN members unless grandfathered in?
If you are an ISP who has an ARIN-issued allocation, you are a=20
member. If you have an end-user assignment or legacy block,
you can be a member, but it is not automatic.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN=
