[170076] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: arin representation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Naslund, Steve)
Sun Mar 23 23:58:53 2014
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@medline.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 03:57:54 +0000
In-Reply-To: <m2a9cg45j8.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>,
North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Sorry Randy,
I was not trying to criticize your terminology. I was just wondering about=
the question trying to be answered here. The holder of an address space a=
nd the end user of the address space are two really different things. The =
holder is often an ARIN member or grandfathered in and an end user (includi=
ng most ISP customers) are not going to be ARIN members. I know that you a=
nd most of the other on here know that they are not "owners" of the space. =
I was just trying to figure out if your term "owner" refers to the holder =
of the space or the user of the space. Not trying to make a political stat=
ement.
I apologize if I gave you the impression that I disapproved of your questio=
n.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]=20
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 10:52 PM
To: Naslund, Steve
Cc: John Curran; North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: arin representation
> I think the term "owned" is a problem here.
sorry not to get your religious icons correctly. full refund below.
jeezus! get a life.
randy
