[170046] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: misunderstanding scale
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Sun Mar 23 19:22:16 2014
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:21:50 -0700
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
To: Timothy Morizot <tmorizot@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFy81r=r4kVeBmjeZu-2=UqcL6Fg-rNBtDAviUt7dCJjMnOpxg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 3/23/2014 3:56 PM, Timothy Morizot wrote:
> My comments represent reality. Your security posture is much worse
> in an IPv4 only configuration than if you enable and control IPv6.
Says you.
On the other hand, there are beaucoup enterprise networks unwilling to
consider to moving to v6 until there are management, control,
administrative, and security issues addressed.
You can continue to deride our issues, and make derisive comments
until your heart's content, but it does not change reality.
And on that, it will be the last I say on the matter on NANOG.
Best & Cheers,
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlMvbI4ACgkQKJasdVTchbK0igD+JF+M3DRoRz5wIJFo+tLV5dFF
KuoOPKOQYJ8Vpf32aMsA/2ccs9CDrbq5hatw+LkL8/CHafTbOWGkhdYfjv7Q6ghM
=HeCa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
