[169983] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Ipv4 end, its fake.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin M. Streiner)
Sat Mar 22 13:47:02 2014

Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQQ8KxxQRoE70_SPZPu_t4QtCWorh_noTZGDC8-yU-FoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Cb B wrote:

> You can pay $3 per ipv4, that is your business. But, it may be worth noting
> that AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, T-Mobile, TWT, Google Fiber all have have
> double digit ipv6 penetration today.

To be fair:
Verizon Wireless, if you're referring to 4G LTE?  Agreed.
I don't know what the plan is for the remaining 3G services.
Verizon Enterprise (what used to be UUNET)?  Agreed.
Verizon Online (Fios, DSL)?  I have to disagree.  Lots of foot-dragging 
here.

Most carriers appear to be making IPv6 capability a requirement for their 
LTE buildouts.  The only major US carrier that I hears was resisting IPv6 
was Sprint, and I don't know if their position has changed in the past 12 
months.

jms


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post