[169970] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bryan Socha)
Sat Mar 22 05:26:26 2014
In-Reply-To: <CALOgxGanwo-f9t805mensmhX1A++mF0cVDaQs-cSiukOyhRXPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 05:25:58 -0400
From: Bryan Socha <bryan@digitalocean.com>
To: trejrco@gmail.com
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Fair point. There are some situations that do need more than most, but
aren't they the ones that should be on ipv6 already???????
I know a few are shouldn't I be on ipv6 and that's fair too. I'm
plqnnning some speaking engagements to cover that. Its not blind and
ignoring.
On Mar 22, 2014 4:36 AM, "TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com> wrote:
> Millions of IPs don't matter in the face of X billions of people, and
> XX-XXX billions of devices - and this is just the near term estimate.
> (And don't forget utilization efficiency - Millions of IPs is not
> millions of customers served.)
>
> Do IPv6.
> /TJ
>
> On Mar 22, 2014 3:09 AM, "Bryan Socha" <bryan@digitalocean.com> wrote:
> >
> > As someone growing in the end of ipv4, its all fake. Sure, the rirs
> will
> > run out, but that's boring. Don't believe the fake auction sites.
> > Fair price of IP at the end is $1 for bad Rep $2 for barely used, $3 for
> no
> > spam and $4 for legacy. Stop the inflation. Millions of IPS exist,
> > there is no shortage and don't lie for rirs with IPS left.
>
