[169800] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Romeo Zwart)
Sun Mar 16 07:46:07 2014
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:45:40 +0100
From: Romeo Zwart <rz+nng@zwart.com>
To: Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0+aXY8qKS4Attt2q_FGoGS7LXRmFBPZHTMzv4HgpEs4qBxWw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi Anurag,
On 16 mrt. 2014, at 10:11, Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com
<mailto:me@anuragbhatia.com>> wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
>
> It seems like http://www.root-servers.org/index.html has been updated
> after quite sometime.
The root-servers.org <http://root-servers.org> site has indeed been
updated recently. We will investigate if the mentioned data errors are
related to the change.
> Seems like data about local Vs global for many of root servers nodes
> is incorrect.
Details of all instances, incl. global vs. local information, are
provided directly by individual root-server operators.
I will ask the responsible people to verify their instances' details,
and if necessary correct these, asap.
Kind regards,
Romeo
> E.g for Netnod i root all nodes are marked as Global nodes. As far as
> I understand it means that routes announced by these nodes are
> announced to transit links as well to make routes visible globally.
> Likely that is not case here right?
>
> Same seems with L root and few others. Do we have webmaster of the
> project on mailing list?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com <http://anuragbhatia.com>
>
> Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>
> Skype: anuragbhatia.com
>
> PGP Key Fingerprint: 3115 677D 2E94 B696 651B 870C C06D D524 245E 58E2
